In defence of democracy

Albeit with some difficulty. A forum has got excited about the BBC essentially erasing the BNP from debate in some areas.

One poster defended this by saying that they 'that only 1 in 7 support them in this area'

To which another pointed out:

'Only one in four voted the present government into power.'

While there are many in the political infirmament with whom I disagree, in a democracy I would prefer their words and deeds were allowed to exist in open contest so they may be defeated by more reasoned, persuasive words and deeds from others.

From such as the Guardian to those it recruits for, both behind and in front of camera, I am both astounded and depressed that there is not recognition that 'favouring' certain 'acceptable' views and giving them voice, decrying those who don't espouse them and, worse, actually telling voting public who go off message and support 'the wrong side' that they are 'misguided', is probably the most divisive and disastrous policy they can possibly follow.

Assuming, that is, they are seeking to encourage democratic, consensual politics and moderation.

Mind you, in the mess we are in, getting in power with 25% approval may be the best we have, but is woeful. However, the minute any pol tells me that they 'have a mandate from the people' on this basis is when they have lost my support for ever more.