Mee-iow

I tend not to refer to other scribes (professional courtesy? Cowardice? Mirror-phobia?), however the new breed of single-minded ticks employed by all the so-called 'quality dailies' to rabble rouse on a single issue is getting under my skin.

Tittle-tattle is OK in moderation, but witch hunts are counter-productive. And sharing gossip dressed as something more in the hope of it sticking an affront to intelligence.

Trying to avoid a troublesome priest moment, I would wish them un-employed, and those who hired them to subject upon the news-reading public to apologise for ever having down so.

Gossip, gossip, gossip...

Better post. Someone has to or I guess you may not get paid.

Here's how the story was 'billed':

'Dave Hill's London blog

Gossip, gossip, gossip...

Sep 23 2008: Ignoring journalists' questions about Mayor Johnson's team only makes them gossip more'

I think I can see the problem here. You have accidently mis-used the word 'journalist', you see. May explain a lot.