New resource for citizen journalists
Good to see a new entry now 'open for comments' again. Well, until it isn't, I guess. That would be ironic.
I do love the drip drip in the mainstream about those that are not 'in the club'. You know, the one where "we don't own the news any more".
But amongst the grudging concessions, you do still get the gems.
'..people claiming their right to tell their story the way they want to.' As opposed to with narratives enhanced, events interpreted or emerging truths facilitated?
I do note the concession 'All BBC journalists should know the answers to these questions - or at least the issues involved in reaching the answers.' . Well, you'd hope, but that is a mighty big 'should', and the evidence would suggest that 'we' are all in this together, you and 'us'. Just ask the Queen, depending on which way she is headed.
'...to try to help find the appropriate answers to these and many other questions, we're developing a publicly available resource.
In the spirit of sharing and education this is of course welcome, though the definitions of what is 'good', 'conventional', etc to some, and possibly not others, will be interesting. One person's terrorist, 'n all...:)
'Our intention isn't to tell people what to do or what not to do.' Good show! It might be interesting to see the response if you did.
'Nor will it be an attempt to tell potential contributors what we want them to send us.' Well, fair enough, within reason. Your ball and pitch. Mind you, who is paying for it all?
Not sure if I see a link to any more above, so I look forward to hearing more when it transpires. Maybe with a more direct way to respond, too.
Addendum - not looking like they are quite getting the desired reaction so far
Journalism.co.uk - Q&A with the National Association of Citizen Journalists: 'We can help news companies'
No comments:
Post a Comment
I believe in freedom of speech. But I also don't like bullies on blogs, even verbal ones, as they can drive away those with something valid to say... or offer.
Subjective is fine, but well argued and substantiated is even better. Calm and polite tops. Anything that crosses my personal line will not go up. There may be reasons given, but not guaranteed.
I'm not too keen on 'Anon' as a handle (and the content usually explains why), so if that's what you opt for it may not make it. Sorry.