Something I had not heard before, from another blog poster, and feel worth preserving...
I seem to remember (from some depressingly deep recess of my memory) that it was Friedrich Hayek who said that putting 'social' in front of any term usually denotes something entirely opposite in meaning. Thus:
"social justice" = gross injustice and official discrimination
"social security" = poverty and insecurity
"social worker" = someone who does nothing
"social democrat" = someone who imposes their views on others after gerrymandering the vote
"social care" = neglect (possibly involving death)
"social contract" = the origin of totalitarianism (J-J Rousseau)
"social reform" = the reimposition of feudalism.
It may have been Popper, but the idea certainly has legs.
As one in the thick of it, I might be tempted to come up with a version for social enterprise, but that might be cutting off the hand...
No comments:
Post a Comment
I believe in freedom of speech. But I also don't like bullies on blogs, even verbal ones, as they can drive away those with something valid to say... or offer.
Subjective is fine, but well argued and substantiated is even better. Calm and polite tops. Anything that crosses my personal line will not go up. There may be reasons given, but not guaranteed.
I'm not too keen on 'Anon' as a handle (and the content usually explains why), so if that's what you opt for it may not make it. Sorry.