Now, who has her on almost daily, again?
How to save the BBC
There is some wry amusement to be had that this 'defence' is penned by such an objective and respected commentator with a truly spectacular - especially of late - record of reflecting the mood of the nation... in a paper read by, well, a self-described 'elite' as reflected by its circulation and the unique way it is funded.
Shame no comments allowed.
From the first para on, it is a truly insightful piece based on what she 'knows' I think.
Taking a leaf from some on this blog, I am only surprised she does not end with a rallying cry of support using the inspiring words: "the trouble with you people..."
A clear endorsement from the author's (now ex-, she is ... 'flighty') favourite PM is all that is required to place such partisan, self-serving tripe in, if not nail a coffin recently vacated in the politico-chatterati infirmament.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I believe in freedom of speech. But I also don't like bullies on blogs, even verbal ones, as they can drive away those with something valid to say... or offer.
Subjective is fine, but well argued and substantiated is even better. Calm and polite tops. Anything that crosses my personal line will not go up. There may be reasons given, but not guaranteed.
I'm not too keen on 'Anon' as a handle (and the content usually explains why), so if that's what you opt for it may not make it. Sorry.