Posts and all, though...
Wikileaks posts a hack of Palin's e-mail account
This one I thought caught soem of the flavour:
Sep 17 08, 11:33pm (about 14 hours ago)
This article is so wrong, it's not even funny.
And for the guardian aswell, which prides itself on its web savvy.
1) the headline, as noted by kerin, is libellous - wikileaks did not hack Palin's email - if I was them I'd be coming after you with a brainspoon. Ok, you changed it pretty quick, your legal dept know their business even if your reporter doesn't.
And this from a pro-Obama person. A 'bang-up' job? After that, who cares about the rest of the story?
No comments:
Post a Comment
I believe in freedom of speech. But I also don't like bullies on blogs, even verbal ones, as they can drive away those with something valid to say... or offer.
Subjective is fine, but well argued and substantiated is even better. Calm and polite tops. Anything that crosses my personal line will not go up. There may be reasons given, but not guaranteed.
I'm not too keen on 'Anon' as a handle (and the content usually explains why), so if that's what you opt for it may not make it. Sorry.