Misquote? What misquote?
Is there anything anyone in this benighted lead..er.. followership that calls itself a government says that can actually be pinned to to any of them (nothing sharp can used any more, for sure) for more than a millisecond before they deny it, claim it was misunderstood, misinterpreted or try and pass it off on a colleague or flunkey? Much less anything they DO.
And if, I ask, rhetorically, as it is patently the case they say or do nothing (especially of any value), what use are any of the packaged, pensioned, useless lot of them anyway?
No comments:
Post a Comment
I believe in freedom of speech. But I also don't like bullies on blogs, even verbal ones, as they can drive away those with something valid to say... or offer.
Subjective is fine, but well argued and substantiated is even better. Calm and polite tops. Anything that crosses my personal line will not go up. There may be reasons given, but not guaranteed.
I'm not too keen on 'Anon' as a handle (and the content usually explains why), so if that's what you opt for it may not make it. Sorry.